Clinton bots more talkative & influential than Trump bots around 2016 debates, study finds

While the popular narrative blames Clinton’s 2016 electoral loss on (Russian) bots, they actually helped her chances, according to a new study finding pro-Clinton bots were more effective at influencing voters than pro-Trump ones.

» Top New Products

How To Make Your Own Killer Content
cs_image_0

Get  A  Powerful  Tool  That  Provides  You  Killer  Contents  For  Your  Websites  And  Articles.                             

$37.00
Vegan Muscle Diet
cs_image_1

Struggling  to  build  muscle  as  a  vegan?    It's  easy  with  the  correct  diet,  let  me  show  you  how.             

$37.00
Woodworking Plans
cs_image_2

Professional-Grade  Woodworking  Plans  and  Projects  Ideas.                                                                                       

$37.00
Make Him Yours
cs_image_3

Learn  How  To  Captivate  A  Man,  Make  Him  Fall  In  Love...  And  Want  To  Give  You  The  World                             

$47.00
Protect Your e-Books and Videos
cs_image_4

Protect  your  digital  contents  with  the  best  protection  software  on  the  market.                                           

$27.00
Amazing Resume Creator
cs_image_5

Quickly  And  Easily  Crank  Out  An  Amazing  Resume  That  Is  Guaranteed  To  Have  Hot  Top  Job  Offers               

$39.95
Wordpress Wiz Ebook Guide
cs_image_6

Guides  Readers  Through  The  Steps  Of  Setting  Up  And  Maintaining  A  Wordpress  Site.                                       

$17.98
Money from google adsense
cs_image_7

learn  how  to  make  money  from  $8  to  $  800  per  month  using  google  adsense.                                                       

$7.00
The Procrastination Fix
cs_image_8

Beat  Your  Procrastination  For  GOOD  Without  'Willpower'  or  'Hard  Work'                                                             

$27.00
Recode Your Brain For Abundance
cs_image_9

Learn  how  you  can  hardwired  your  brain  and  design  your  destiny    and    the  freedom  you  deserve               

$47.00
The New Four Magic Moves To Winning Golf
cs_image_10

Discover  The  Four  Secret  Magic  Moves  PGA  Pros  Don't  Want  You  to  Know                                                               

$37.05
Help To Get Pregnant
cs_image_11

Need  help  to  get  pregnant,  the  answers  exist,  get  the  plan  here.                                                                       

$47.00

While there were almost twice as many pro-Trump bots in operation before the 2016 election, the pro-Clinton bots were much more likely to change people’s political opinions because they were much more active, MIT researcher Tauhid Zaman discovered.

Zaman analyzed 2.3 million tweets referencing the second presidential debate and found less than one percent of the accounts involved were bots. He measured the real users’ opinions using two models – one based on their tweets and one on their network of connections – and then remeasured without the inclusion of the bots in the networks. To his surprise (he’s a registered Democrat, according to a disclosure statement that accompanied the study) the average level of support for Clinton dropped from 58 to 42.

The Clinton bots, it turned out, were able to exercise such an outsize influence on their networks because they tweeted on average 1.5 times as often as the Trump bots. The content of the bots’ tweets was roughly the same – retweets of the candidates or other influential users – but the quantity of those retweets had a definite effect.

Zaman cautioned that the results could not be extrapolated to the entire voting population – the research only dealt with a short period of time surrounding the debates and studied a relatively small sample of Twitter users. Still, those in charge of social media “outreach” for candidates can learn a lot from this information – if you’re going to fake a following, fake an enthusiastic following!

While Zaman’s research showed Trump had a higher rate of support among bots, a 2015 analysis using the tool TwitterAudit found Clinton had more fake followers – 41 percent of her total Twitter fans.

If you like this story, share it with a friend!

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Post Author: martin

Avatar
Martin is an enthusiastic programmer, a webdeveloper and a young entrepreneur. He is intereted into computers for a long time. In the age of 10 he has programmed his first website and since then he has been working on web technologies until now. He is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of BriefNews.eu and PCHealthBoost.info Online Magazines. His colleagues appreciate him as a passionate workhorse, a fan of new technologies, an eternal optimist and a dreamer, but especially the soul of the team for whom he can do anything in the world.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.