According to Citi executive Alice Milligan, it is essential to know your worth and take credit for your ideas and achievements.
Abandoning feelings of self-doubt and challenging yourself to step out of your comfort zone will advance your career and enhance your reputation.
Confidence is fundamental to establishing gender equality in the workplace.
It’s 2018, and despite significant momentum toward gender equality — notably in recent months — women still face a variety of challenges with respect to our professional trajectories and the pathway to the C-Suite. Between gender discrimination, pay inequality, and societal expectations, the playing field is far from level — a reality that is starkly evident in the numbers.See the rest of the story at Business Insider
ROGER Federer’s path to a 20th grand slam title became much clearer after Rafael Nadal retired hurt in the fifth set of his quarter-final against Marin Cilic on Tuesday night.
The Spaniard joined big names Novak Djokovic and Grigor Dimitrov in the exit queue and Federer will be looking to make the most of their absence. The Swiss maestro can book his place in the semi-finals with a win over 19th seed Tomas Berdych tonight.
The unseeded Tennys Sandgren and Hyeon Chung do battle in today’s other quarter-final, both vying to make the final four of a grand slam for the first time.
In women’s action Angelique Kerber is out to maintain her dominant run when she faces American Madison Keys while top seed Simona Halep will be hoping an ankle injury sustained earlier in the tournament doesn’t hamper her against bit-hitting Czech Karolina Pliskova.
The Aussie pairing of Lleyton Hewitt and Sam Groth will also be out to continue their dream run in their men’s doubles quarter-final clash today.
ROD LAVER ARENA
11am
(21) Angelique Kerber (GER) v (17) Madison Keys (USA)
Tennys Sandgren (USA) v Hyeon Chung (KOR)
(1) Simona Halep (ROU) v (6) Karolina Pliskova (CZE)
7.30pm
(19) Tomas Berdych (CZE) v (2) Roger Federer (SUI)
Marcus Daniell (NZL)/Dominic Inglot (GBR) v (7) Oliver Marach (AUT)/Mate Pavic (CRO)
(11) Juan Sebastian Cabal (COL)/Robert Farah (COL) v Sam Groth (AUS)/Lleyton Hewitt (AUS)
9.45am
Kyrgios’ tennis IQ is ‘off the charts’
Kyrgios is smarter than we realise.Source:Getty Images
Few doubt Nick Kyrgios has the talent to win a grand slam but his mental approach has always been a question mark.
He went some way towards converting the naysayers with a more mature display at this year’s Australian Open. He refused to lose focus despite several off-court distractions in his second round win over Viktor Troicki, overcame a disappointing second set to bounce back against Jo-Wilfried Tsonga and pushed World No. 3 Grigor Dimitrov to four sets — three of them tiebreaks.
Despite his career being littered with notable temper tantrums, Kyrgios may have much more between the ears than Australia realises. Renowned Aussie tennis coach Darren Cahill — who coaches women’s World No. 1 Simona Halep and has also mentored Lleyton Hewitt and Andre Agassi — says the 22-year-old’s tennis IQ is next level.
Knowing how to structure points, what shot to play to which ball and how to dictate an opponent on the court are all aspects that may not be noticeable to the casual observer watching on TV, but Gilbert says the young Aussie has smarts where it counts.
Kyrgios doesn’t have an official coach but perhaps his own tennis intelligence is enough with the guidance of some key figures around him.
“He’s had a good 12 months. He’s grown up a lot in the last 12 months,” Gilbert told Sportsday SA on FiveAA radio.
“Being around Lleyton Hewitt has helped him a ton. Coming back and being a part of that Davis Cup team — he’s embraced what it’s like to be an Australian athlete and play for a team.
“He says he doesn’t have a coach but he’s got a bit of help now. He’s got Jason Stoltenberg, he’s got Lleyton — both those guys are good with tennis and Nick already has a tennis IQ that is off the charts and he very rarely plays the wrong shot.
“But he’s also worked a lot harder off the court which is going to be the most important thing for him moving forward. He’s a big, strong athlete and he’s very fast but he has to look after his body because that’s what’s going to give him longevity and success in his career.”
It’s very obvious how you must play tennis matches in extreme heat , understand how 2 manage the points you play & their structure.
Australian Open quarter-finalist Tennys Sandgren said in an interview on Tuesday that he deleted several years of tweets to “move forward” and create a “version of a cleaner start” after he was questioned about his connections with right-wing activists on social media.
Sandgren’s social media activity has been closely examined during his surprising run to the final eight at Melbourne Park. He was asked after his fourth-round win over Dominic Thiem about his links to controversial political figures and conspiracy theories.
During his post-match news conference on Monday, Sandgren denied supporting the far right movement, but said he found “some of the content interesting”. In his interview with ESPN on Tuesday, he sought to clarify that remark, saying it’s “definitely not ‘alt-right’ content is interesting, just some individuals’ specific content”.
“(It’s) not really specific ‘alt-right’ content that I deem of value, I think that’s very incorrect and I don’t find information like that to be of value or to hold onto any of those things,” he said.
“So it’s not who I am as a person in any way.”
He said he deleted all of his tweets not because it’s “something that I’m really necessary embarrassed about”, but because he thought that “creating a version of a cleaner start is not a bad call”.
“People can screenshot, save and distribute everything they would like to,” he said. “I know that, and that’ fine. It is what it is. It’s just something that I thought wouldn’t be a bad way to kind of move forward.”
Sandgren, who describes himself as a devout Christian, said he’s also learning and growing as a person and “definitely doesn’t have it all together”. The 26-year-old Sandgren is from Gallatin, Tennessee, and played two years of tennis at the University of Tennessee. His mother is from South Africa.
“I’m more than happy to talk with people and let people know how I feel about things,” he said. “I’ve had to put the social media aside for now, I’ll take a look at it and I’ll take the criticism and I’ll take the good with the bad and keep learning and growing as a person and try to move forward.”
]]>https://briefnews.eu/live-hidden-kyrgios-trait-is-off-the-charts/feed/0Boony trait Lyon’s embraced to become spiritual leader
https://briefnews.eu/boony-trait-lyons-embraced-to-become-spiritual-leader/
https://briefnews.eu/boony-trait-lyons-embraced-to-become-spiritual-leader/#respondSat, 09 Dec 2017 04:11:08 +0000http://briefnews.eu/boony-trait-lyons-embraced-to-become-spiritual-leader/FORMER Australia No 3 David Boon wasn’t allergic to a beer.
He was a spiritual leader in the Aussie team and had the huge honour of singing our song ‘Underneath the Southern Cross I stand’ when we won a Test match or series.
Flashback to December 30, 1994. We are in the ‘dungeon’, our name for the dressing room in the bowels of the great MCG.
We circle the human keg that is Boony, who props himself on a bench and gives a couple of words about all of us.
Then he sings. Shivers go down my spine as we share a cold one and scream at the top of our lungs.
Like this series, we had just gone 2-0 up and The Ashes was as good as over.
The figures from this series tell a significant story about the respective attacks.
The Aussies have taken 40 wickets at an average of 24, England’s has 28 at 39.
For all the chat of short bowling, the Aussie quick cartel has pitched the new ball fuller then England.
Each looks capable of running through the English batting line-up.
Then there is Nathan Lyon. It’s turning into Groundhog Day for the English lefties facing him.
He has Moeen Ali four times, Alastair Cook, Dawid Malan and Mark Stoneman once.
They look a walking wicket when facing him and have to develop a run-scoring plan.
The Brisbane first innings led to some English optimism with the inexperienced trio of Stoneman, Malan and James Vince making 50s.
But the Aussies have now found ways to slow the runs from Stoneman and Malan and have just plain beaten Vince.
It’s time to get Jonny Bairstow up the order.
He looks the most likely English batsman, bar Joe Root, to score a century but is getting left with the tail.
England must turn promising fifties into matchwinning tons, like Australia have.
They have a blueprint of how to hurt the Aussies with their bowling from Adelaide. Bowl it up and get them driving on the up with good fields.
Moeen’s bowling is a big concern. He looks like getting a wicket as often a solar eclipse. If he isn’t dangerous he needs to be tight to build pressure.
If the English can’t score tons and bowl a fuller length at the WACA, Lyon — the current singer of the Aussie anthem — will be loosening up his vocal chords by day three.
]]>https://briefnews.eu/boony-trait-lyons-embraced-to-become-spiritual-leader/feed/0The head of the New York Stock Exchange explains the overlooked trait he sees in almost every great entrepreneur
https://briefnews.eu/the-head-of-the-new-york-stock-exchange-explains-the-overlooked-trait-he-sees-in-almost-every-great-entrepreneur/
https://briefnews.eu/the-head-of-the-new-york-stock-exchange-explains-the-overlooked-trait-he-sees-in-almost-every-great-entrepreneur/#respondThu, 21 Sep 2017 12:12:29 +0000http://briefnews.eu/the-head-of-the-new-york-stock-exchange-explains-the-overlooked-trait-he-sees-in-almost-every-great-entrepreneur/Frank Chaparro
Thomas Farley has seen countless entrepreneurs walk in and out of the New York Stock Exchange since he assumed his position as head of the iconic Wall Street institution close to four years ago.
So he has a pretty keen sense of what it takes to be a successful business leader.
The NYSE, the largest stock exchange by market capitalization, is the listing venue of some of the biggest companies in the world, ranging from energy giants like Chevron to global tech companies such as Alibaba.
Business Insider recently visited Farley at the New York Stock Exchange and asked him for his best advice for making it big as an entrepreneur. He said there is one often overlooked trait, which he thinks is shared by just about every great business leader he’s come across.
Optimism.
“Optimism is a far more scarce commodity than people think,” Farley said.”The leaders who come through the exchange whether it’s Johnny Chou or Alibaba’s Jack Ma – are incredibly optimistic people.” Chou is the CEO of Best, a Chinese logistics company that just listed its shares in New York.
Farley said the difficulties that underpin the process of taking an idea and turning into a successful business requires an unbridled optimism.
“When you are an entrepreneur starting a business you are going to encounter hurdle after barrier after rejection,” he said.”Ultimately to be successful you need to be optimistic.”
“You need to see the world for what it can be, not what it is.”
Farley, 41, got his break when Jeff Sprecher, CEO of Intercontinental Exchange Group, appointed him head of New York Board of Trade in 2007. In 2013, Intercontinental acquired NYSE Euronext, and Farley was named COO. In May 2014 he was named president, becoming the second youngest person ever to run the NYSE.
]]>https://briefnews.eu/the-head-of-the-new-york-stock-exchange-explains-the-overlooked-trait-he-sees-in-almost-every-great-entrepreneur/feed/0This Triangle Test Will Reveal Your Dominant Personality Trait
https://briefnews.eu/this-triangle-test-will-reveal-your-dominant-personality-trait/
https://briefnews.eu/this-triangle-test-will-reveal-your-dominant-personality-trait/#respondWed, 06 Sep 2017 23:00:21 +0000http://briefnews.eu/this-triangle-test-will-reveal-your-dominant-personality-trait/
You got: Creativity
You’re a creative soul who is always open to new perspectives and experiences. You’re the type of person who can make something from nothing and you’re constantly presenting solutions that people didn’t think were even possible. But sometimes it can be exhausting to be creative! We totally get it. Don’t let yourself crumble under pressure to produce something “good” or original. Embrace your creative spirit, even on days where you don’t feel creative at all.
You might feel like you’re the always the quietest person in the room but that doesn’t mean you’re insecure. Your mind is constantly buzzing with new ideas and what might be seen to others as “being shy” is really just you focusing your energy on powering up for your next project or challenge. Throughout your life, other creative people have naturally gravitated toward you. And let’s get one thing straight: You have no problem being assertive or social, as long as it’s within your personal boundaries and comfort level.
You’re generally laid-back and able to enjoy the little moments in life, but when it comes to a project that you’re passionate about, you’re ALL IN. You’re the type of person who just dives right into your ideas and isn’t afraid to take risks. And while you might get distracted or feel insecure once in awhile, the result from your efforts is usually astounding.
]]>https://briefnews.eu/this-triangle-test-will-reveal-your-dominant-personality-trait/feed/0People with THIS trait are more likely to cheat on their partner
https://briefnews.eu/people-with-this-trait-are-more-likely-to-cheat-on-their-partner/
https://briefnews.eu/people-with-this-trait-are-more-likely-to-cheat-on-their-partner/#respondWed, 09 Aug 2017 21:11:23 +0000http://briefnews.eu/people-with-this-trait-are-more-likely-to-cheat-on-their-partner/
Men and women with a specific thing in common have been found more likely of straying – but what is it?
If your partner is a cat owner they could be one to watch.
Cat owners are officially the most adulterous pet owners in the country.
IllicitEncounters.com, a UK dating website for married people, found that over a quarter of 1,000 of its members own cats, making them by far the most adulterous pet owners.
The survey found that you’d also be inclined to be wary if your significant other owns a rabbit, with 17 per cent of all respondents giving a home to the pet perhaps best known for its virility.
A further 15 per cent owned reptiles, such as lizards and snakes, while as many as 12 per cent owned a rodent of some kind, such as a hamster, gerbil or mouse, 9 per cent of respondents are home to fish.
Unsurprisingly, dog owners are officially the most faithful pet owners – just seven per cent of all respondents owned a dog.
Spokesperson for IllicitEncounters.com, Christian Grant, said: “It’s often been said that a person reflects the traits of their animal, so is it any surprise to see cats top the list?
“The jury has always been out on whether cats genuinely love their human companions, or whether their loyalty lies with whoever can best satisfy their stomachs.
“Simply put, cats will follow whoever can best satisfy their needs, no matter how long they’ve been with a particular human.
“It’s also no surprise to see rabbits, who have a pretty notorious reputation for their powers of reproduction and reptiles such as snakes – not exactly known for their loyalty – closely follow cats.
“On the other hand, has there ever been any doubt about the loyalty of a dog?
“Their love is and always has been unconditional, and those qualities are often reflected in their owners. Simply, put, if you want trust, love and a bond that’s almost unbreakable, marry a dog owner.”
]]>https://briefnews.eu/people-with-this-trait-are-more-likely-to-cheat-on-their-partner/feed/0Women who carry THIS trait are more likely to cheat on their men
https://briefnews.eu/women-who-carry-this-trait-are-more-likely-to-cheat-on-their-men/
https://briefnews.eu/women-who-carry-this-trait-are-more-likely-to-cheat-on-their-men/#respondSat, 29 Jul 2017 16:36:35 +0000http://briefnews.eu/women-who-carry-this-trait-are-more-likely-to-cheat-on-their-men/
Women who describe themselves as ‘lonely’, ‘virile’ and are housewives are more likely to cheat.
Men who are tall, smart and rich are more likely to carry out infidelity, according to the latest findings by dating website for married people IllicitEncounters.com.
The site studied more than 10,000 profiles to find out what common traits link to create the archetypal cheat.
And the most common trait among cheating women was actually their job.
As many as 30 per cent of all women on IllicitEncounters.com describe themselves as lonely.
This was followed by the 27 per cent of women who described themselves with terms such as ‘virile’ and finally, housewives, who make up 20 per cent of all female profiles on the site.
For cheating men, their most common trait was wealth, with references to being rich, wealthy or affluent appearing in a staggering 45 per cent of all profiles.
This was followed by height. To be exact, 40 per cent of all male profiles on the site were 6ft or taller.
Finally, intelligent men who were educated to at least a university degree level made up as much as 38 per cent of all profiles on the site, indicating that smarter men are more likely to cheat.
The site’s spokesperson, Christian Grant, explained: “Our results show that men have a tough time suppressing their ego.
“Tall, affluent, smart – these men have it all…or at least, they think they can have it all. They want to have their cake and eat it too, and that includes having as many relationships as they see fit.
“Not to mention, as a smart, wealthy and tall man, you’re more likely to be attracting female attention, whether you like it or not, which only serves to fuel their ego and make them consider an affair as a plausible option.
“Women on the other hand, paint a different story altogether. Your typical cheating woman isn’t driven by arrogance, ego or lust, but by a sense of loneliness thanks to a lack of satisfaction in her marriage.
“This loneliness is further compounded for housewives, who potentially spend hours alone, only to further be neglected when their husbands come home.”
]]>https://briefnews.eu/women-who-carry-this-trait-are-more-likely-to-cheat-on-their-men/feed/0Trump just got a hero’s welcome in a country that may have underestimated his defining trait
https://briefnews.eu/trump-just-got-a-heros-welcome-in-a-country-that-may-have-underestimated-his-defining-trait/
https://briefnews.eu/trump-just-got-a-heros-welcome-in-a-country-that-may-have-underestimated-his-defining-trait/#respondThu, 06 Jul 2017 21:57:14 +0000http://briefnews.eu/trump-just-got-a-heros-welcome-in-a-country-that-may-have-underestimated-his-defining-trait/WARSAW — One the best days of Donald Trump’s nascent presidency unfolded 4,400 miles away from the White House, where he was greeted Thursday by party leaders whose nationalistic instincts mirror his own and a bused-in crowd of Poles whose chants of his name punctuated his lofty speech about patriotism and the clash of civilizations.
The last-minute trip was, in a way, Trump’s attempt to eat dessert before dinner. At the Warsaw Uprising Monument in the city’s Old Town on Thursday, Trump was greeted by American flags, chants of, “USA! USA!,” and banners reading, “Make Poland Great Again.” But his reception at the G-20 summit in Hamburg on Friday will likely be much chillier.
The US president and Poland’s ruling Law and Justice party (PiS) share a distrust of international organizations and are wary of accepting refugees — two qualities that set them apart from German Chancellor Angela Merkel, a staunch globalist with an open-door immigration policy who has been called the new leader of the free world.
Trump’s visit was meant to show Merkel, whom he met later Thursday, and other European leaders that have clashed with him on issues ranging from his controversial travel ban to his withdrawal from the Paris climate accord, that he has allies elsewhere. Poland’s minister of internal affairs, Mariusz Błaszczak, went as far as to compare Trump to Ronald Reagan.
But the Poles, who have been urging Trump to visit since November and went to enormous lengths to impress him, may have underestimated his transactional and capricious approach to virtually everything.
Carlos Barria/Reuters
At a press conference with Polish President Andrzej Duda on Thursday morning, Trump said the 5,000 American troops currently stationed in Poland to ward off any aggression from Russia will stay, for now. But there was never “a discussion of guarantees” that they would remain there long-term, he said.
Later, at the Warsaw Uprising Monument in Old Town’s Krasiński Square, Trump laid a wreath at the landmark erected in honor of Poland’s resistance to the Nazis’ occupation during World War II. Supporters lined the streets carrying American flags and banners reading “Make Poland Great Again,” crowding bleachers and periodically booing Polish opposition figures. Trump spoke to them directly, loudly, and often.
“While we will always welcome new citizens who share our values and love our people, our borders will always be closed to terrorism and extremism of any kind,” Trump said to loud chants of, “Donald Trump! Donald Trump!”
“We are fighting hard against radical Islamic terrorism,” he continued, “and we will prevail.”
Visibly discouraged by Trump’s initial ambivalence toward keeping US troops stationed in Poland, Poles breathed a sigh of relief when he reiterated the US’s commitment to NATO’s mutual defense clause known as Article 5. In typical Trump fashion, however, that too came with caveats.
“My administration has demanded that all members of NATO finally meet their full and fair financial obligations,” Trump said, reciting one of his favorite talking points.
Carlos Barria/Reuters“To those who would criticize our tough stance, I would point out that the United States has demonstrated not merely with words but with its actions that we stand firmly behind Article V, the mutual defense commitment,” he continued.
“Words are easy but actions are what matters. And for its own protection — and you know this, everybody knows this, everybody has to know this — Europe must do more. Europe must demonstrate that it believes in its future by investing its money to secure that future.”
Trump said Poland is “one of the NATO countries that has actually achieved the benchmark for investment in our common defense.” But he reiterated that, ultimately, the Poles’ will and national pride will determine the country’s success, no matter how much money they commit to the defense organization.
The message was aimed at amplifying Poland’s national pride, delineating the limits of the globalist institutions he and his advisers so mistrust, and glorifying western civilization “in the face of those who would subvert and destroy it” — including Russia, whose expansionism and “destabilizing activities” he denounced to wild applause.
“As the Polish experience reminds us, the defense of the West ultimately rests not only on means, but also on the will of its people to prevail and be successful and get what you have to have,” Trump said, citing “strong families” and “strong values” as some of the West’s defining characteristics. “The fundamental question of our time is whether the West has the will to survive.”
Parts of the speech were a clear reflection of the Trump camp’s populist impulses — the president twice condemned the “steady creep of government bureaucracy” and cited it as an impediment to individual freedom that risks undermining western civilization.
But there were hints of cognitive dissonance as he held up Poland, whose ruling party has sought to stifle free speech and control the media, as “an example for others who seek freedom.”
“We treasure the rule of law and protect the right to free speech and free expression,” Trump said, hours after slamming CNN in his press conference with Duda as “fake news” and “dishonest.” He said NBC was “equally as bad,” prompting Duda to agree that Poland’s media shares similar “pathologies.”
Their remarks stood in stark contrast to President Barack Obama’s last year, when he used his visit to Warsaw to emphasize that a free press is “what makes us democracies.”
“Not just by the words written in constitutions or in the fact that we vote in elections,” he told Duda, “but the institutions we depend on every day — such as rule of law, independent judiciaries and a free press.”
]]>https://briefnews.eu/trump-just-got-a-heros-welcome-in-a-country-that-may-have-underestimated-his-defining-trait/feed/0The most popular books of all-time all share one trait
https://briefnews.eu/the-most-popular-books-of-all-time-all-share-one-trait/
https://briefnews.eu/the-most-popular-books-of-all-time-all-share-one-trait/#respondMon, 15 May 2017 23:34:11 +0000http://briefnews.eu/the-most-popular-books-of-all-time-all-share-one-trait/Throughout history, people have turned to works of literature for guidance, entertainment, and education. Modern businesses aim to tell stories that leave a long-lasting impact as well, and should look to examples of historical success to influence how they create their own content.
Today’s infographic comes to us from Global English Editing, and it looks at 20 of the most popular books in the world. All of the books listed, even those published decades or centuries ago, have made an enduring impact on readers to this day. They have achieved this by stirring discussion and sparking debate wherever they are read.
Controversy: The Evergreen Theme
One of the important traits shared by every book on this list is the controversy that has swirled around each of them. This can be seen across different time periods and genres.
People have questioned the identity and authorial authenticity of Homer and decried the upending of creationism proposed by Darwin. Even a children’s book like the modern bestselling series, Harry Potter, can be a magnet for discussion over what is morally right and wrong.
It is often the case the that most popular and enduring literary works will not only captivate, but also address controversial issues in such a way that people will be talking about them for generations.
Lessons From History
The recent bestselling streak of George Orwell’s 1984, first published in 1950, is an interesting illustration of this trend.
The dystopian novel was banned upon its translation and release in the former USSR due to its implicit critique of Stalinist political ideology. By contrast, in the 1970s and 1980s, several American counties challenged1984 on the grounds that it might promote communist ideals. In the 21st century, Orwell’s best-known work has been revisited by a new generation of readers as the American political climate continues to create new uncertainties about governance, the distortion of facts, and social control.
Visual Capitalist
For Business Content, Bold Will Hold
The most popular books ever written can teach modern businesses a great deal about what it takes to make content that is evergreen, meaningful, and primed to engage their readers. Creating discussion is key in the age of the reactive “hot take” style of article. Your ability to stand out in the cultural, historical, or political context for having a point of view that many people find worthy of debating will give your work the staying power it needs.
Considering that within any given minute there are 2.4 million Google searches taking place and over 700,000 people logging into Facebook, this is no easy task. But whether it’s through a new product or via customer engagement, creating meaningful discussion is key to making a business’ voice heard through all the noise.
]]>https://briefnews.eu/the-most-popular-books-of-all-time-all-share-one-trait/feed/0New research reveals a personality trait that can make you a better decision-maker
https://briefnews.eu/new-research-reveals-a-personality-trait-that-can-make-you-a-better-decision-maker/
https://briefnews.eu/new-research-reveals-a-personality-trait-that-can-make-you-a-better-decision-maker/#respondSat, 15 Apr 2017 07:28:25 +0000http://briefnews.eu/new-research-reveals-a-personality-trait-that-can-make-you-a-better-decision-maker/Flickr/The Natural Step Canada
In the personal context, making good decisions is the difference between having the life you want and forever wondering what could have been.
In the political one, it’s the difference between war and peace, prosperity and want. In the business world, it’s what separates seven-figure paydays from bankruptcy filings.
In short, making good choices is pretty close to the most important life skill you’ll ever master. How do you get better at it?
There are dozens of different frameworks and tools to sharpen up your analytic skills and focus your thinking on the right variables.
Many of them are extremely useful. But according to interesting new research out of Duke University, all these tricks probably won’t do you much good if you don’t have one other essential ingredient of sensible decision making — intellectual humility.
What’s intellectual humility?
When it comes to good decision-making, qualities like intelligence, patience, curiosity, and self-control get talked about all the time, but intellectual humility is less often mentioned. What is is exactly? In everyday language, it means the willingness to accept that you might be wrong and to not get defensive when arguments or information that’s unfavorable to your position comes to light.
And according to this new study, those that lack this quality make markedly worse choices that those who have it in abundance. To figure that out, the research team asked volunteers to read arguments for and against religious belief.
They then conducted a series of experiments that gauged how open to being wrong the volunteers were and how it affected their estimation of people with opposing views, as well as how accurately they’d understood the arguments they’d been presented with.
Those who displayed less intellectual humility were worse at judging the reliability of sources. For instance, they attributed personal and logical failings to those who disagreed with them that weren’t actual present (i.e. they said “this guy is an arrogant, uninformed jerk” when, in fact, the author showed no signs of being arrogant or ill informed). They also did a worse job of distinguishing between mere speculation and fact-based arguments, even on subjects as mundane as the benefits of flossing.
As an interesting side note given out highly partisan political climate, those with a healthy understanding of their own possible failings were also much more understanding of politicians who change their minds. It was those who were lowest in intellectual humility who were most outraged by “flip flopping” leaders. (But sorry atheists, there was no evidence that believers were any less intellectually humble than non-believers.)
None of this is entirely surprising — logic suggests that in order to think clearly you need to be open to admitting when you are wrong — yet this quality often gets overlooked in discussions of decision-making.
‘Strong opinions weakly held’
Which isn’t to say that no has trumpeted the importance of the quality these researchers are labelling “intellectual humility.” Career coach Mark Bonche recently wrote about how fast learning requires a willingness to admit error on the HBR blogs, and various business gurus and VCs have long argued that the best kind of thinker is one with “strong opinions weakly held.” Here’s Stanford business school professor Bob Sutton writing on the origins and importance of the idea way back in 2006:
Perhaps the best description I’ve ever seen of how wise people act comes from the amazing folks at Palo Alto’s Institute for the Future… they advise people to have “strong opinions, which are weakly held.” They’ve been giving this advice for years, and I understand that it was first developed by Institute Director Paul Saffo.
Bob explained that weak opinions are problematic because people aren’t inspired to develop the best arguments possible for them, or to put forth the energy required to test them. Bob explained that it was just as important, however, to not be too attached to what you believe because, otherwise, it undermines your ability to “see” and “hear” evidence that clashes with your opinions.
Some leaders have long understood the importance of “intellectual humility” then, but it’s clear from both the current political climate and plenty of business missteps that not everyone has internalized the value of incorporating a whole lot of humility into your decision making. For those folks, this study might serve as a healthy reminder that you can’t learn if you can’t admit that you might be wrong.