Piers Morgan and Susanna Reid welcomed Professor Kehinde Andrews and journalist Tom Harwood onto Good Morning Britain today to discuss whether controversial historical statues should remain after the statue of plantation and slave over Robert Milligan was removed in London, following Black Lives Matter protestors who toppled a Edward Colston statue. During a debate on whether the statue of Lord Nelson should be taken down and if so, should the Nelson Mandela statue be pulled down too, Andrews compared Hitler with Winston Churchill.
Morgan asked: “Would you target Lord Nelson and by the same logic would you target Nelson Mandela?”
Andrews dismissed the idea of Mandela’s statue being pulled down before addressing an earlier argument between Harwood and Morgan on whether he would have agreed with statues of Hitler being pulled down.
Morgan hit back: “I rate Mandela along with Churchill as the two greatest people of my lifetime. I had the pleasure of meeting him, he was a remarkable man and he came out as a man of peace but he went into prison as a man who advocated violence for political ambition and he’s admitted himself that he did that.
“My point is you can construct a negative about Mandela as you can about Churchill and others, where is the line?”
Explaining his argument, Andrews said: “I just want to really point this out; the two people you mentioned – Winston Churchill and Lord Nelson are both famous for what?
“Violence! I mean, levels of violence which ail in comparison to the small amounts of violence Mandela committed.”
He continued: “The key thing about this is, what is the history we want to remember, statues are not about history – you don’t learn about history from walking around the street, you learn history from schools etc.
“It’s what is the version of history we want to present and do you want a version of history that is slave traders, colonists, fascists – is that what you want in your public space?
“That’s the debate that we’re having and I think it’s about high time we get rid of theses statues – however we get rid of them – these campaigns have been going for years and sometimes to make an omelette you have to crack eggs.”
Andrews said: “That’s one of the things about the racism of the Nazis, eugenics, University Central London where they’ll be tearing their statue soon. Churchill believed in eugenics and those beliefs which led to the extermination of the Jews were not that different the beliefs that led to the slavery of us they can from the same place.”
Interrupting, Morgan said: “I’ve got to defend Winston Churchill, when this country was threatened with its greatest threat to civilisation we ever had, of Adolf Hitler and the Nazis and when it looked like the odds were insurmountable, he almost single–handedly railed this country to defeat the most racist person there’s ever been.”
“That’s why I said to you, you can paint a negative picture of the early life of Nelson Mandela too, many people did. I’m not equating them but if you’re going to equate Churchill to Hitler you’re making an equivalent that I find offensive too,” Morgan added.
Those watching the discussion at home took to Twitter to express their own views on the matter.
One said: “If you can’t accept that Churchill held racist views & made comments in favour of eugenics while also doing a great thing in fighting against Hitler then you’re very blinkered. All those things can be true at the same time (and they are) #GMB.”
“Get this idiotic professor off comparing Churchill to Hitler. #GMB.” someone else wrote.
Another added: “Fair argument until he compared Churchill to Hitler.. absolute idiot #gmb.”
“Wow, this bloke comparing Churchill to Hitler.. @piersmorgan is right when he says that’s offensive #GMB,” a viewer wrote.
Someone else argued: “To be clear, In the mind of Britain, Churchill wasn’t a racist he just did and said racist things #GMB.”
]]>https://briefnews.eu/piers-morgan-erupts-as-professor-compares-winston-churchill-to-hitler-offensive/feed/0You can’t win: Ex-top astronaut apologizes to Twitter for citing Churchill, sparks more fuss
https://briefnews.eu/you-cant-win-ex-top-astronaut-apologizes-to-twitter-for-citing-churchill-sparks-more-fuss/
https://briefnews.eu/you-cant-win-ex-top-astronaut-apologizes-to-twitter-for-citing-churchill-sparks-more-fuss/#respondMon, 08 Oct 2018 14:09:36 +0000http://briefnews.eu/you-cant-win-ex-top-astronaut-apologizes-to-twitter-for-citing-churchill-sparks-more-fuss/
Quoting Winston Churchill seems harmless enough, but a former NASA astronaut found out the hard way that it’s impossible to please everyone on Twitter, after apologizing for citing the revered British leader.
Scott Kelly, who has made multiple trips into space, issued an apology on Sunday after being hounded by furious netizens about a tweet in which he quoted British Prime Minister Winston Churchill.
“One of the greatest leaders of modern times, Sir Winston Churchill said, ‘in victory, magnanimity.’ I guess those days are over,” Kelly tweeted, in an apparent commentary on Brett Kavanaugh’s contentious confirmation to the Supreme Court.
But some responses to this nugget of wisdom were far from charitable.
“Churchill was a mass murderer. His actions led to the death of millions due to famine in bengal state of erstwhile India during WW2. He compared indians to beasts. He may be a hero for a lot of u, not for indians like me,” one enraged netizen wrote.
Churchill was a mass murderer. His actions led to the death of millions due to famine in bengal state of erstwhile india during WW2. He compared indians to beasts. He myt be a hero for a lot of u, not for indians like me.
“I am very surprised that of all people you endorse a racist bigot who was directly responsible for millions of deaths in Bengal famine of 1943,” another Twitter user fired back. Others pointed to Churchill’s racism and full-bodied support for colonialism.
Startled by the angry reactions to his somewhat innocuous tweet, Kelly posted a follow-up in which he promised to better “educate” himself about Churchill.
“Did not mean to offend by quoting Churchill. My apologies. I will go and educate myself further on his atrocities, racist views which I do not support. My point was we need to come together as one nation. We are all Americans. That should transcend partisan politics,” he wrote.
But like all tragicomedies that unfold on Twitter, his apology created another wave of fuss.
“Are you kidding me? You have nothing to apologize for. Churchill was a great man. We live in crazy times,” one user replied.
“Never apologize when you quote someone who defeated Hitler. Never,” another commented, apparently unaware of the Soviet Union’s existence.
Even a few blue checkmarks weighed in, urging Kelly to rethink his apology.
You are disgracing yourself here. Please stop bending to the will of deranged online trolls.
Please don’t apologize. Winston Churchill, like all of us, had serious human failings. But unlike most of us—he possessed genuine greatness. And that greatness may have saved freedom & democracy. Ask the Twitter scolds to name a hero or heroine who didn’t have serious flaws.
But at least Kelly accurately quoted Churchill – no easy task when the internet is awash with bogus quotes attributed to the famous British leader. In August, Texas Governor Greg Abbott tweeted a meme that claimed Churchill once said that leftists would be the “fascists of the future.” In response, the Twitterati then flooded the governor with memorable and extremely fake “Churchill” quotes.
]]>https://briefnews.eu/you-cant-win-ex-top-astronaut-apologizes-to-twitter-for-citing-churchill-sparks-more-fuss/feed/0Piers Morgan passionately DEFENDS 'heroic' Winston Churchill in fiery TV CLASH
https://briefnews.eu/piers-morgan-passionately-defends-heroic-winston-churchill-in-fiery-tv-clash/
https://briefnews.eu/piers-morgan-passionately-defends-heroic-winston-churchill-in-fiery-tv-clash/#respondTue, 15 May 2018 20:11:30 +0000http://briefnews.eu/piers-morgan-passionately-defends-heroic-winston-churchill-in-fiery-tv-clash/
Piers Morgan and Afua Hirsch got into a heated debate over Winston Churchill’s status as a British historical hero.
The Good Morning Britain host slammed Ms Hirsch’s attempts to “besmirch” Churchill with claims suggesting the former PM was racist.
Mr Morgan said: “The problem is that you take national heroes who have done extraordinary things for this country and you pick holes and you try to besmirch them and disparage their reputation. Why?
“You know what? Beating Adolf Hitler, winning the war, stopping him exterminating every Jew he could get his hands on, these to me are far greater achievements than the negatives that lurk in his past, which lurk in anybody’s past.”
The exchange became increasingly heated, with Mr Morgan challenging the British writer to name one British hero she has “complete respect for”.
But Ms Hirsch struggled to name someone, claiming she was not “comfortable with the concept of hero”.
He continued: “Who do you respect? Which national British hero – you are British, you said – do you actually have complete respect for? Name one.
“You don’t have anybody you can point to? You can’t name a single person in British history you deem to be heroic.”
Ms Hirsch hit back at the GMB host arguing she found Winston Churchill’s flaws more fascinating than the “propagandistic version of history”.
She said: “I am not comfortable with the idea of heroes. The concept of hero is unhelpful
“I am a British person, I think a fundamental British value is integrity and intellectual curiosity and I can’t understand why we as a modern nation in 2018 are only comfortable with the propagandist version of history.
“Why can’t we have a more interesting relationship with history? Churchill was far more fascinating than the cardboard cutout saint that we paint him to be. He was a deeply flawed man.”
]]>https://briefnews.eu/piers-morgan-passionately-defends-heroic-winston-churchill-in-fiery-tv-clash/feed/0Gary Oldman on Churchill Darkest Hour SEQUEL with STALIN and Roosevelt
https://briefnews.eu/gary-oldman-on-churchill-darkest-hour-sequel-with-stalin-and-roosevelt/
https://briefnews.eu/gary-oldman-on-churchill-darkest-hour-sequel-with-stalin-and-roosevelt/#respondWed, 28 Feb 2018 22:43:18 +0000http://briefnews.eu/gary-oldman-on-churchill-darkest-hour-sequel-with-stalin-and-roosevelt/
Rather than the Darkest Hour, the new movie is already looking like it will be the British star’s own finest hour.
After years of awards snubs and disappointments, it looks almost certain that the Academy will follow the BAFTAs and give Oldman his first Best Actor Oscar this Sunday.
Unsurprisingly, the actor himself may not be ready to say farewell to Winston Churchill.
In a new interview he reveals the idea for a sequel set at the 1945 Yalta Conference after World War 2 and givng the tantalising possibility that his towering performance could be matched by new on screen incarnations of the equally iconic US and Russian leaders.
In the latest Hollywood Reporter interview, Oldman explained how close he came to not accepting the role at all.
He said: “Racked with insecurity. I turned down Churchill many times. And didn’t want to do it. Didn’t want to go near it. And, ultimately, I think it was fear. And you’re walking in the shadow of [others].”
After it resulted in the greatest accolades of his acreer, he happily discusses where the story could go next: “At the end of the war, there’s the summit with Stalin… And so that is another. Yeah, you know, we might. And we’d get someone. Roosevelt’s a great character, he’s on his way out there isn’t he? Yeah, so maybe. But I need a break from the makeup chair.”
Of course, it’s not just the incredible make-up that transformed Oldman into the iconic war leader. The actor revealed just how much he put into the role, someting he fears younger generations might not understand.
He said: “What you see in Darkest Hour – there’s facility and talent and intuition and things that are at work there. But what you are really looking at is hard homework, hard work. And that is sitting at my kitchen table, pounding those lines in. You are playing someone whose brain is moving is that thing again, a running condition, that inner motor that Churchill had, dynamic, a brain, people not being able to catch up with him. You can’t be searching for those words, searching for the text. You’ve got to know it to a point. I knew when I got to rehearsal for Darkest Hour, I was off the book. Like a play. I knew it like a play. And then it’s in you. And it’s got to be in your blood stream. And that is homework.”
Oldman added: “So there’s things — you can’t teach intuition, you can hone it, you can sharpen it, but you can’t give that to someone. There’s things that you can’t teach. But there are many things that you can. And I see this with my own kids, the younger generation. They want to find it all in five minutes. And the trick is to put the work in. It’s like a dancer: you’re not supposed to see the hard work.”
]]>https://briefnews.eu/gary-oldman-on-churchill-darkest-hour-sequel-with-stalin-and-roosevelt/feed/0Darkest Hour 2: Gary Oldman considering Winston Churchill RETURN for sequel and stage play
https://briefnews.eu/darkest-hour-2-gary-oldman-considering-winston-churchill-return-for-sequel-and-stage-play/
https://briefnews.eu/darkest-hour-2-gary-oldman-considering-winston-churchill-return-for-sequel-and-stage-play/#respondWed, 28 Feb 2018 08:47:47 +0000http://briefnews.eu/darkest-hour-2-gary-oldman-considering-winston-churchill-return-for-sequel-and-stage-play/
The 59-year-old actor looks almost certain to win the Best Actor Oscar at the 90th Academy Awards on Sunday evening.
Oldman portrayed Sir Winston Churchill in Darkest Hour, garnering large critical acclaim for his performance.
Covering just a few weeks in 1940, there is still much of the World War II primer minister’s life that could be explored and Oldman is certainly open to at least two other projects.
According to The Hollywood Reporter, the actor is adapting a short story by Churchill – based on a dream he had – into a play and is interested in a film sequel to Darkest Hour, set in 1945 at the end of the war.
On the play, Oldman said: “It’s [about] the ghost of his father, Randolph, who visits him in his studio at Chartwell [Churchill’s country residence].
“It’s two people, not an expensive thing to do. It might be something I’ll try and get on its feet.
“I long to go back [to the stage]. It’ll be quite terrifying, I’m sure, after 20 years.”
On a follow-up to Darkest Hour, the actor continued: “There could be [a sequel] because at the end of the war, there’s the summit with Stalin and [Roosevelt].”
]]>https://briefnews.eu/darkest-hour-2-gary-oldman-considering-winston-churchill-return-for-sequel-and-stage-play/feed/0Remembering the Bethnal Green tube disaster: The war-time tragedy Churchill hushed up
https://briefnews.eu/remembering-the-bethnal-green-tube-disaster-the-war-time-tragedy-churchill-hushed-up/
https://briefnews.eu/remembering-the-bethnal-green-tube-disaster-the-war-time-tragedy-churchill-hushed-up/#respondSat, 24 Feb 2018 19:50:44 +0000http://briefnews.eu/remembering-the-bethnal-green-tube-disaster-the-war-time-tragedy-churchill-hushed-up/
TONY SAPIANO / ALAMY STOCK
The Bethnal Green tube disaster was originally hushed up
By “it” she means the worst civilian disaster of the Second World War, albeit one that was all but absent from the history books for many years.
On a rainy evening of March 3, 1943, 173 people were killed in a crush on the stairs at London’s Bethnal Green Underground station while sheltering from what they thought was a German bombing raid.
Of the victims 84 were women and 62 of them children, while 60 others needed hospital treatment.It was death and injury on a shocking scale and poignantly it was nothing to do with bombing but instead the result of a mass panic caused by the sound of an anti-aircraft gun.
Nor did the wider public know anything about it. Anxious to avoid dampening morale or for the scale of the catastrophe being used as propaganda by enemy forces Winston Churchill used the Official Secrets Act to order a media blackout.
Combined with the traditionally British stoicism of the age it meant the catastrophe was barely discussed, even among the survivors or grieving relatives.
Related articles
TONY SAPIANO
Babette Clarke survived with her mum and sister
I have thought many times over the years that if we had got that first bus I wouldn’t be talking to you now as we would have arrived earlier and been caught in the middle of the crush.
Babette Clark
“You didn’t talk about it. It was as simple as that,” Babette, now a sprightly 86, recalls. It has taken decades for the voices of the survivors to be heard and for the victims to be commemorated and last Christmas relatives of the dead and their supporters gathered at Bethnal Green for the unveiling of a memorial in time for the 75th anniversary of the disaster.
A striking, inverted replica of the Underground station’s staircase carved with the names of the victims, it hangs near the entrance as a reminder of what happened.
Babette was there when it was unveiled and confides that she shed a tear. “It was very moving. Standing there took me back.”
Born and raised near Bethnal Green she recalls how when the air-raid siren sounded at 8.17pm that Wednesday night she gathered her clothes and blankets and along with her mother and older sister travelled to the bus stop to make the short journey to the Tube station.
Then half built – the platforms were finished but there was no track – people had been using it as a bomb shelter since the Blitz of 1940 and snakes of people descending the stairs via the station’s single entrance was a familiar routine.
“Mum had rented two bunks down there. We had a Morrison shelter but none of us liked sleeping in it so if the siren warning went we would all troop off to get our blanket and pillow and head for the bus,” says Babette.
“On this occasion when we got outside we had just missed a bus and had to wait a few minutes for the next one. I have thought many times over the years that if we had got that first bus I wouldn’t be talking to you now as we would have arrived earlier and been caught in the middle of the crush.”
It was a dank, miserable night as the family made their way from the bus stop through the all-encompassing darkness of the blackout, with two more bus-loads following hot on their heels.
“All of a sudden floodlights came on and the rockets went off,” Babette recalls. “It wasn’t a sound anyone had heard before and it was frightening. That’s what caused the pushing.”
What the crowd didn’t know was that it was actually an anti-aircraft gun in nearby Victoria Park but the whistle of the discarded casings made the East Enders think they were under attack.
ALAMY STOCK
The new memorial was unveiled last year
Amid mounting panic wave after wave of people pushed forward on the Underground stairs to join the hundreds already gathered below. Yet unknown to them a woman carrying her baby had tripped, causing a pile-up.
“Then it was like a domino effect, everyone just falling on top of each other,” says Babette. Standing near the top of the stairs she and her sister were caught in the crush.
“I was holding my sister’s hand when someone fell on the back of me,” she recalls.
“Someone else was trying to drag her out and I can remember my sister saying, ‘Don’t pull me so hard I’ve got my little sister.’ Then finally an air raid warden got us out.”
She remembers the crying and screaming as well as the heat of the bodies. “It was horrible,” she shudders.
The Blitz: 76 years on
Mon, March 20, 2017
The Blitz, from the German word Blitzkrieg meaning ‘lightning war’, was the name used by the British press to describe the heavy air raids carried out over Britain in 1940 and 1941, during the Second World War
Getty Images
1 of 24
A milkman delivering milk in a London street devastated during a German bombing raid
Also caught in the crush with his two brothers was Joseph Walker, now 83 but then just eight. “We all started to go down the steps and I got separated from my brothers,” he says.
‘‘The crowd was getting bigger and I got pushed down the stairs in a wave but luckily my head was clear so I could breathe. It was a long time before we were pulled out. So many were dead around me but someone saw my hand move and I was pulled out. My family were out searching for me.”
Joseph spent nine months in hospital recovering having suffered damage to his spleen, legs, neck and arms. Babette, meanwhile, emerged unscathed along with her sister although there was anguish when after being taken to an air-raid shelter to recover they realised their mother was not there.
“We were wondering where mum was but a little while later she came walking into the shelter. She had been taken into the church opposite. We just felt huge relief.”
Many were not so lucky. Ivy Brind lost her mother as well as her two-year-old nephew Barry, whom she was looking after for her sister-in-law.
GETTY
Tube stations across London became air raid shelters
“She was holding Barry and saw the crowds at the entrance so she turned to go back home,” recalls her daughter Sandra Scotting. “Unfortunately the tide of people coming towards her just threw her back through the doorway and down the stairs. She lay on her back with Barry in her arms while people fell on top of them.”
Barry died along with Ivy’s mum yet for many years the incident was never discussed. “Mum never spoke about that night and nor did my sister,” says Babette.
In fact all were sworn to secrecy but the truth emerged once children went to school to find empty desks and employees realised their colleagues were missing.
“In many cases they have only been able to tell family and friends what happened to them fairly recently,” says Ivy’s daughter Sandra. “With people being killed at home and abroad in the war they just had to get on with life, yet for the Tube shelter survivors it has been with them for ever. It was a very traumatic event for mum.”
Their anguish was worsened by the discovery that the government also suppressed details about the lack of basic safety measures such as lighting and handrails, details that the council had previously reported to them.
It is one reason Sandra was one of a group of people who set up the Stairway To Heaven charity to establish a suitable memorial, believing that the plaque placed above the staircase entrance on the 50th anniversary of the tragedy was inadequate. That campaign finally came to fruition just before Christmas last year when the memorial was unveiled on a chilly December day.
The ribbon was cut by Joan Martin MBE who was the casualty doctor on duty at the nearby hospital on the night of the tragedy, treating the injured and dealing with many of the victims. She has since sadly passed away at the age of 103, never able to forget the trauma of that night.
“She carried it with her throughout her life stating that it was the worst night of her medical career,” Sandra reveals.
Like everyone else present at the unveiling ceremony to the new memorial Dr Martin took comfort from the fact that now at least those involved in the Bethnal Green Tube shelter disaster will never be forgotten.
For Babette it is a poignant legacy of a catastrophe that she feels could have been avoided: “It happened and it needn’t have happened. It is just very sad.”
]]>
https://briefnews.eu/remembering-the-bethnal-green-tube-disaster-the-war-time-tragedy-churchill-hushed-up/feed/0Churchill pro-Brexit? His grandson reveals what WW2 PM would have thought (EXCLUSIVE)
https://briefnews.eu/churchill-pro-brexit-his-grandson-reveals-what-ww2-pm-would-have-thought-exclusive/
https://briefnews.eu/churchill-pro-brexit-his-grandson-reveals-what-ww2-pm-would-have-thought-exclusive/#respondTue, 16 Jan 2018 15:14:23 +0000http://briefnews.eu/churchill-pro-brexit-his-grandson-reveals-what-ww2-pm-would-have-thought-exclusive/
Since the release of Darkest Hour, movie fans and history buffs have been wondering what Churchill would have made of Brexit.
Gary Oldman, who plays the World War II prime minister in the new movie, reckons he wanted a United States of Europe and would have blocked Brexit.
Meanwhile Brian Cox, who starred in last year’s Churchill, claimed he would have been “horrified” by Brexit.
Now in an exclusive interview with Express.co.uk, Churchill’s grandson, Sir Nicholas Soames, has given his opinion on what his grandfather would have thought.
The Tory MP, who is a Remainer, said: “It’s difficult to see how a man who always faced outwards to the world…would see a world in which we’re all interconnected and networked.
“At one stage during the war he talked about merging France and Britain together, to save France.
“I don’t think my grandfather would have thought it would be a good idea, in one of the most difficult times in all our lives and history, to have jumped ship – I just don’t believe it.”
“But how can I tell? How can I possibly tell? How can anyone tell? So I think we have to say it’s one of the great unknowns. What do you think Henry VIII would have thought of it?”
]]>https://briefnews.eu/churchill-pro-brexit-his-grandson-reveals-what-ww2-pm-would-have-thought-exclusive/feed/0Darkest Hour: Gary Oldman’s Churchill speech receives STANDING OVATIONS from audiences
https://briefnews.eu/darkest-hour-gary-oldmans-churchill-speech-receives-standing-ovations-from-audiences/
https://briefnews.eu/darkest-hour-gary-oldmans-churchill-speech-receives-standing-ovations-from-audiences/#respondTue, 16 Jan 2018 10:16:01 +0000http://briefnews.eu/darkest-hour-gary-oldmans-churchill-speech-receives-standing-ovations-from-audiences/
The World War II drama is one of this year’s hottest Oscars contenders and audiences have been showing their appreciation around the world.
During the final scene of Darkest Hour, Oldman’s Churchill addresses the House of Commons with the famous “We shall fight on the beaches” speech, in June 1940.
According to the Telegraph, the famous piece of oratory has been met with “extraordinary” standing ovations in the both the UK and US.
One of Darkest Hour’s producers, Eric Fellner, admitted he was surprised by the news, saying it “very rarely happens.”
He added: “It has been reported back to us, not only here but in America, and across the whole of the country not just in the big metropolitan areas.
“We’ve been hearing it a lot. It’s very surprising. It very rarely happens other than at the premiere or special screenings of the films, so it’s quite extraordinary. It’s completely unusual, totally unusual.
“When we decided to make the film it was two years ago. We made the film because we believed it was a fascinating piece of history that most people don’t know the detail of, that it was incredibly engaging and exciting in the way it was going to be told, and it was entertaining.”
Some audience members have claimed the show of standing ovations was a resurgence of the Dunkirk Spirit captured in the film.
Sir Nicholas Soames, son of Churchill’s daughter Mary, said: ““I thought it was excellent, and not only because of the brilliance of the acting and direction.
“You look at Gary Oldman, before and after – what they achieved with creating my grandfather’s persona is exceptional.”
]]>https://briefnews.eu/darkest-hour-gary-oldmans-churchill-speech-receives-standing-ovations-from-audiences/feed/0In a career filled with bad guy roles, Ben Mendelsohn is very thankful to show a different side in Churchill drama ‘Darkest Hour’
https://briefnews.eu/in-a-career-filled-with-bad-guy-roles-ben-mendelsohn-is-very-thankful-to-show-a-different-side-in-churchill-drama-darkest-hour-2/
https://briefnews.eu/in-a-career-filled-with-bad-guy-roles-ben-mendelsohn-is-very-thankful-to-show-a-different-side-in-churchill-drama-darkest-hour-2/#respondMon, 25 Dec 2017 08:07:34 +0000http://briefnews.eu/in-a-career-filled-with-bad-guy-roles-ben-mendelsohn-is-very-thankful-to-show-a-different-side-in-churchill-drama-darkest-hour-2/Focus Features
Ben Mendelsohn plays King George VI in “Darkest Hour,” one of the rare times he hasn’t played a bad guy in a movie.
Don’t worry though, he’s got some major bad guy roles coming, like Sheriff of Nottingham in “Robin Hood” and the villain in “Ready Player One.”
But he’s quiet about a possible return of his “Rogue One” character Director Krennic in any future “Star Wars” movies.
After years of being a struggling actor in Australia, Ben Mendelsohn got his breakout in 2010 as the patriarch of a crime family on the run in “Animal Kingdom,” and hasn’t looked back since.
Finding his mark playing complex dark characters in indies like “The Place Beyond the Pines” and “Slow West,” Mendelsohn hit it big when he scored the role of Director Orson Krennic in “Rogue One: A Star Wars Story” last year. But in his latest role Mendelsohn proves he can do more than just play the bad guy. As King George VI opposite Gary Oldman as Winston Churchill in “Darkest Hour” (in theaters nationwide), Mendelsohn shows off his softer side as he plays a man tasked with keeping the United Kingdom strong during World War II while trying to match wits with Churchill, though suffering a stammer when he speaks. (He plays the same character who earned Colin Firth a best actor Oscar for “The King’s Speech.”)
Mendelsohn talked to Business Insider about preparing for the challenging task as well as his upcoming anticipated roles, which range from the Sheriff of Nottingham in “Robin Hood” to a gaming nerd in “Ready Player One” — yes, he’s a bad guy in both.
Jason Guerrasio: When you had to wrap your head around that you’re going to play King George VI, was it exciting or scary?
Ben Mendelsohn: It was both. It was very unexpected. I got why [director] Joe [Wright] thought of me in one respect. If you look at me in profile and look at him it’s not a bad match. There are certain, well, I guess, shyness to me and the portrayal of him. But other than that it’s a pretty big risk.
Guerrasio: And when you say risk, you mean the weight of the role?
Mendelsohn: Yeah. It’s a risk from Joe’s perspective. I think there’s plenty of people he could have cast that were more, um —
Guerrasio: English.
Mendelsohn: Yeah. Exactly. Wouldn’t have to worry about the accent stuff. But I’m very thankful that he did ask me to do it. And then it’s the company you’re in. Gary Oldman playing Winston Churchill, that is a film I would go see.
Focus FeaturesGuerrasio: What was the research like? Did you want to go really deep in knowing everything about King George?
Mendelsohn: No. I was mostly interested in what I could see and hear. I was less interested in the various interpretations of the man. I knew the rough outlines of his situation. It was really to get a sense of where the stutter was and what feeling you get from him.
Guerrasio: So basically watching “The King’s Speech” would have screwed you up.
Mendelsohn: By the time the Jello had nearly set I went back and watched “The King’s Speech.” I hadn’t planned on it and then I just thought, you know what — um, I’m trying to find a way to say this that you won’t have to edit me —
Guerrasio: Screw it!
Mendelsohn: Yeah. Thank you. [Laughs.] And I’m glad I did because it is a beautiful portrayal.
Guerrasio: Was it less looking at how Colin did the voice and more how he moved as the King? His swagger?
Mendelsohn: It was less of that. No. I wasn’t looking at Colin’s performance as to how he interpreted the guy. I wasn’t interested to try to take up or ignore, it was more getting the whole sense of the story. The stuff that affected me more was the business with his dad and brother. That’s what I took on board a bit more.
Guerrasio: It sounded like you got in early with Gary, all the actors were given a good chunk of rehearsal time before shooting started.
Mendelsohn: They had a long rehearsal period which I was there for a few days of. And thank God we did. Look, it was a task and it helps a lot to get comfortable with the people you’re going to be doing it with. Gary and I had met before, we worked on “The Dark Knight Rises.”
Guerrasio: That’s right!
Mendelsohn: We don’t do anything together, but we are in one scene where Commissioner Gordon gets up and makes a little speech in the back of Wayne Manor. So we were together over a couple of night shoots together.
Guerrasio: While shooting “Darkest Hour,” between shooting are you and Gary talking in your character voices? Are you scared you’ll lose the stutter?
Mendelsohn: Well, once you know where it is you can pick it up and put it down. You don’t need to do all that stuff.
Guerrasio: The connection between you and Gary is you both play bad guys so well. For you, is it hard to find a role like this? Something that just on paper doesn’t scream, “evil!”
Mendelsohn: I consider it a real compliment to be offered the bad guy. No complaints on that. But it was a delight to be offered this role in part because he’s a good guy.
A24Guerrasio: Is it more fun to play the dark roles?
Mendelsohn: No. Well, it depends. I think it’s more fun to work than not to work.
Guerrasio: [Laughs.]
Mendelsohn: There’s a certain malevolent delight that baddies get to express. But that’s pretty short lived.
Guerrasio: Coming up you play the Sheriff of Nottingham in the latest “Robin Hood” movie. Will you give him a more playful feel? Like Alan Rickman did in “Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves?”
Mendelsohn: Ah, no one is ever going to top Alan Rickman.
Guerrasio: He was damn good in that role.
Mendelsohn:No one is ever going to top that, and I’m not trying. But this is an origin story of Hood, it’s a very explosive kind of piece. But no, the sheriff is not a good guy at all. But Nolan Sorrento in “Ready Player One” is a fantastic bad guy. He’s a nerd that’s got too much power. I guess most bad guys you look at what they do with their flaws. How they’ve compensated for them in some way and how they try to make everyone else pay for it. That seems to be one of the thematic things about most bad guys.
Guerrasio: I think that’s why people gravitate to those kind of roles, they plug their darkness and insecurities into what they see that character doing.
Mendelsohn: Yeah. And that kind of misbehaving, as it were, comes vicariously.
Guerrasio: With “Ready Player One,” was that just another “pinch me” moment in your career?
Mendelsohn: Oh yeah. I remember meeting Spielberg for the first time and I said, “I don’t know what your intention is but this is good enough for me, I got to sit in a room with you.” He had seen “Bloodline,” he was a big “Bloodline” fan.
Guerrasio: Are you bummed there’s no more “Bloodline?” Did you feel there was more story to be told?
Mendelsohn: I think from my point of view [my character] Danny Rayburn was always in the early part of that telling. I think that those guys had a lot more in them. But that’s the way it is. Few things have been as good to me as “Bloodline.”
Disney/LucasfilmGuerrasio: With the news that Rian Johnson is going to expand “Star Wars” and is tasked with making more movies — not to mention all the one-off movies — is it possible Director Krennic comes back?
Mendelsohn: I don’t know. I really don’t know what’s happening with any of that.
Guerrasio: Was it a one-and-done contract for you, or did you have an option for multiple films?
Mendelsohn: It would be remiss for me to discuss contractual details.
Guerrasio: Well, I had to try.
Mendelsohn: [Laughs.]
Guerrasio: And I guess this is another one you can’t really say, but are the rumors true that you’ll be in Captain Marvel?
Mendelsohn: That’s another I wish we could talk about, but I can neither confirm or deny the existence of such a project, if there were such a project. [Laughs.]
Guerrasio: Honestly, these kind of questions, are these fun for you? Because you’ve had to navigate through them a lot for a year-plus now.
Mendelsohn: Look, honestly, I’m a guy who sat around being out of work for a very long time so this is not a problem. [Laughs.] This is a very, very lucky position to be in.
]]>https://briefnews.eu/in-a-career-filled-with-bad-guy-roles-ben-mendelsohn-is-very-thankful-to-show-a-different-side-in-churchill-drama-darkest-hour-2/feed/0In a career filled with bad guy roles, Ben Mendelsohn is very thankful to show a different side in Churchill drama ‘Darkest Hour’
https://briefnews.eu/in-a-career-filled-with-bad-guy-roles-ben-mendelsohn-is-very-thankful-to-show-a-different-side-in-churchill-drama-darkest-hour/
https://briefnews.eu/in-a-career-filled-with-bad-guy-roles-ben-mendelsohn-is-very-thankful-to-show-a-different-side-in-churchill-drama-darkest-hour/#respondMon, 11 Dec 2017 03:55:39 +0000http://briefnews.eu/in-a-career-filled-with-bad-guy-roles-ben-mendelsohn-is-very-thankful-to-show-a-different-side-in-churchill-drama-darkest-hour/Focus Features
Ben Mendelsohn plays King Henry VI in “Darkest Hour,” one of the rare times he hasn’t played a bad guy in a movie.
Don’t worry though, he’s got some major bad guy roles coming, like Sheriff of Nottingham in “Robin Hood” and the villain in “Ready Player One.”
But he’s quiet about a possible return of his “Rogue One” character Director Krennic in any future “Star Wars” movies.
After years of being a struggling actor in Australia, Ben Mendelsohn got his breakout in 2010 as the patriarch of a crime family on the run in “Animal Kingdom,” and hasn’t looked back since.
Finding his mark playing complex dark characters in indies like “The Place Beyond the Pines” and “Slow West,” Mendelsohn hit it big when he scored the role of Director Orson Krennic in “Rogue One: A Star Wars Story” last year. But in his latest role Mendelsohn proves he can do more than just play the bad guy. As King George VI opposite Gary Oldman as Winston Churchill in “Darkest Hour” (in select theaters now, nationwide December 22), Mendelsohn shows off his softer side as he plays a man tasked with keeping the United Kingdom strong during World War II while trying to match wits with Churchill, though suffering a stammer when he speaks. (He plays the same character who earned Colin Firth a best actor Oscar for “The King’s Speech.”)
Mendelsohn talked to Business Insider about preparing for the challenging task as well as his upcoming anticipated roles, which range from the Sheriff of Nottingham in “Robin Hood” to a gaming nerd in “Ready Player One” — yes, he’s a bad guy in both.
Jason Guerrasio: When you had to wrap your head around that you’re going to play King Henry VI, was it exciting or scary?
Ben Mendelsohn: It was both. It was very unexpected. I got why [director] Joe [Wright] thought of me in one respect. If you look at me in profile and look at him it’s not a bad match. There are certain, well, I guess, shyness to me and the portrayal of him. But other than that it’s a pretty big risk.
Guerrasio: And when you say risk, you mean the weight of the role?
Mendelsohn: Yeah. It’s a risk from Joe’s perspective. I think there’s plenty of people he could have cast that were more, um —
Guerrasio: English.
Mendelsohn: Yeah. Exactly. Wouldn’t have to worry about the accent stuff. But I’m very thankful that he did ask me to do it. And then it’s the company you’re in. Gary Oldman playing Winston Churchill, that is a film I would go see.
Focus FeaturesGuerrasio: What was the research like? Did you want to go really deep in knowing everything about King Henry?
Mendelsohn: No. I was mostly interested in what I could see and hear. I was less interested in the various interpretations of the man. I knew the rough outlines of his situation. It was really to get a sense of where the stutter was and what feeling you get from him.
Guerrasio: So basically watching “The King’s Speech” would have screwed you up.
Mendelsohn: By the time the Jello had nearly set I went back and watched “The King’s Speech.” I hadn’t planned on it and then I just thought, you know what — um, I’m trying to find a way to say this that you won’t have to edit me —
Guerrasio: Screw it!
Mendelsohn: Yeah. Thank you. [Laughs.] And I’m glad I did because it is a beautiful portrayal.
Guerrasio: Was it less looking at how Colin did the voice and more how he moved as the King? His swagger?
Mendelsohn: It was less of that. No. I wasn’t looking at Colin’s performance as to how he interpreted the guy. I wasn’t interested to try to take up or ignore, it was more getting the whole sense of the story. The stuff that affected me more was the business with his dad and brother. That’s what I took on board a bit more.
Guerrasio: It sounded like you got in early with Gary, all the actors were given a good chunk of rehearsal time before shooting started.
Mendelsohn: They had a long rehearsal period which I was there for a few days of. And thank God we did. Look, it was a task and it helps a lot to get comfortable with the people you’re going to be doing it with. Gary and I had met before, we worked on “The Dark Knight Rises.”
Guerrasio: That’s right!
Mendelsohn: We don’t do anything together, but we are in one scene where Commissioner Gordon gets up and makes a little speech in the back of Wayne Manor. So we were together over a couple of night shoots together.
Guerrasio: While shooting “Darkest Hour,” between shooting are you and Gary talking in your character voices? Are you scared you’ll lose the stutter?
Mendelsohn: Well, once you know where it is you can pick it up and put it down. You don’t need to do all that stuff.
Guerrasio: The connection between you and Gary is you both play bad guys so well. For you, is it hard to find a role like this? Something that just on paper doesn’t scream, “evil!”
Mendelsohn: I consider it a real compliment to be offered the bad guy. No complaints on that. But it was a delight to be offered this role in part because he’s a good guy.
A24Guerrasio: Is it more fun to play the dark roles?
Mendelsohn: No. Well, it depends. I think it’s more fun to work than not to work.
Guerrasio: [Laughs.]
Mendelsohn: There’s a certain malevolent delight that baddies get to express. But that’s pretty short lived.
Guerrasio: Coming up you play the Sheriff of Nottingham in the latest “Robin Hood” movie. Will you give him a more playful feel? Like Alan Rickman did in “Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves?”
Mendelsohn: Ah, no one is ever going to top Alan Rickman.
Guerrasio: He was damn good in that role.
Mendelsohn:No one is ever going to top that, and I’m not trying. But this is an origin story of Hood, it’s a very explosive kind of piece. But no, the sheriff is not a good guy at all. But Nolan Sorrento in “Ready Player One” is a fantastic bad guy. He’s a nerd that’s got too much power. I guess most bad guys you look at what they do with their flaws. How they’ve compensated for them in some way and how they try to make everyone else pay for it. That seems to be one of the thematic things about most bad guys.
Guerrasio: I think that’s why people gravitate to those kind of roles, they plug their darkness and insecurities into what they see that character doing.
Mendelsohn: Yeah. And that kind of misbehaving, as it were, comes vicariously.
Guerrasio: With “Ready Player One,” was that just another “pinch me” moment in your career?
Mendelsohn: Oh yeah. I remember meeting Spielberg for the first time and I said, “I don’t know what your intention is but this is good enough for me, I got to sit in a room with you.” He had seen “Bloodline,” he was a big “Bloodline” fan.
Guerrasio: Are you bummed there’s no more “Bloodline?” Did you feel there was more story to be told?
Mendelsohn: I think from my point of view [my character] Danny Rayburn was always in the early part of that telling. I think that those guys had a lot more in them. But that’s the way it is. Few things have been as good to me as “Bloodline.”
Disney/LucasfilmGuerrasio: With the news that Rian Johnson is going to expand “Star Wars” and is tasked with making more movies — not to mention all the one-off movies — is it possible Director Krennic comes back?
Mendelsohn: I don’t know. I really don’t know what’s happening with any of that.
Guerrasio: Was it a one-and-done contract for you, or did you have an option for multiple films?
Mendelsohn: It would be remiss for me to discuss contractual details.
Guerrasio: Well, I had to try.
Mendelsohn: [Laughs.]
Guerrasio: And I guess this is another one you can’t really say, but are the rumors true that you’ll be in Captain Marvel?
Mendelsohn: That’s another I wish we could talk about, but I can neither confirm or deny the existence of such a project, if there were such a project. [Laughs.]
Guerrasio: Honestly, these kind of questions, are these fun for you? Because you’ve had to navigate through them a lot for a year-plus now.
Mendelsohn: Look, honestly, I’m a guy who sat around being out of work for a very long time so this is not a problem. [Laughs.] This is a very, very lucky position to be in.